Frequently I hear people complaining about how the Democrat party has abandoned its roots by opposing Leiberman in the primary. Frankly this gets pretty old for me. Why should a party not take the oppurtunity to remove a politician who disagrees with the party base on most issues simply because he’s been in the Senate before. Lamont has a good chance of winning the general election and therefore removing Leiberman and replacing him with Lamont is equivalent to beating a moderate Republican. I disagree with Lamont on pretty much everything, but I think that any party-line Democrat voter should choose Lamont over the DINO Leiberman.
Leiberman, Lamont, and Liberals